Thursday, November 19, 2009
Rethink pink: breast cancer screening evidence met politics and lost
The controversy started at exactly 5 p.m. Monday, when the Annals of Internal Medicine lifted its embargo on new breast cancer screening recommendations and the rest of the medical community simultaneously released opposing positions. With lines drawn and positions taken, a furor began ultimately pitted evidence-based medicine against political machinations. So far, medicine has lost. 
The recommendations, issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, suggest that asymptomatic individuals with no family history or other risk factors could wait before starting mammograms and undergo screening every two years instead of annually. They balanced the benefits of less frequent screening against the harms of more frequent screening by reviewing the evidence and creating models.
The recommendations have since been on the pages of every newspaper in America, from the smallest locals to the biggest dailies. The American College of Physicians is tracking "impressions," as they're called, in the millions.
There's always a downside to new knowledge, and it's playing out in week following the announcement. It will take time for physicians to digest the new recommendations. It will take time to explain them to patients. In the meantime, public discourse has been messy.
Experts have told women to talk to their doctors about how evidence-based recommendations apply to individual circumstances. But other medical societies are sticking to their guns on annual screenings at earlier ages, and it's unsettling for patients to see doctors disagree and even more unsettling when shouting matches erupt on television.
But neither the government nor insurers are rushing out to make dramatic changes to existing practice of medicine. To calm fears, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius clarified that the doctors who drafted the recommendations, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, comprise an independent body of experts who review evidence but don't set policy. To calm fears, she stated that women should still go to their doctors to discuss their individual needs. Insurers aren't going to change their policies, either.
In short, the recommendations inform the talks between doctors and patients. They give physicians something to consider during the informed consent process. Consider the words of family physician David Baron, MD, who said, "I respect [USPSTF] a great deal. They've got no horse in the race. They are independent experts." Take it from practicing physician Jan Gurley, MD, who summarized in plain language how recommendations should impact encounters between physicians and patients.
This is in contrast to internist and TV commentator Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD, who went on the attack about a "distant and impersonal 'review of data' from published studies." In an op-ed shopped around to media outlets, she further ranted that, "I am profoundly concerned that government 'experts,' far removed from the daily care of patients, are sitting 'on high' to proclaim that women don't need to start mammograms at age 40."
And of course, Dr. Vliet decried it as a cost cutting measure and as the start of "government-mandated, guideline-based rationing of health care." Those are her poorly chosen words. But she's not alone.
U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee bemoaned that, "This is where you start getting a bureaucrat between you and your physician." Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota joined the misinformation brigade, starting her press conference on the task force recommendations by blaming President Obama and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Watch for yourself.
Hijacking evidence-based recommendations to further partisan debate is a semantic trick. And it's a disgrace.
Labels: cancer, evidence-based medicine, guidelines, health care reform, health policy, patient communication, patient education, women's health
posted by Ryan DuBosar at
12:15 PM
2 Comments
Friday, November 13, 2009
QD: News Every Day--flu's growing tally
ACP Internist's daily digest of news and events continues with the latest numbers on H1N1 infections, more respect for primary care and a boot-strap approach to health care reform in Kentucky.
H1N1 influenza
Swine flu has killed 4,000 people and sickened 22 million, according to new estimates released this week. More vaccine is on the way; the Food and Drug Administration approved GlaxoSmithKline's vaccines and the drugmaker expects to deliver 7.6 million doses by the end of the year. (Philadelphia Inquirer, AP/The Washington Post)
Evidence-based medicine
One path to less expensive health care is to look at the common tests and procedures that really don't work, or may have adverse effects in patient care. Meanwhile, drugs that were shown to reduce some forms of cancer go largely unused. (Forbes, New York Times)
Primary care shortage
Pauline Chen, MD, (a surgeon) writes that the first way to cure the primary care shortage is to improve its image problem. (New York Times)
In case you missed it ...
Rural Kentucky has high rates of some of the worst health in America. But it also has leading facilities and residents who took a boot-strap approach to health care reform. (Kaiser Health News)
Smoking rates are (slightly) rising again. (Philadelphia Inquirer)
Labels: evidence-based medicine, H1N1, primary care shortage, QD, rural medicine, smoking cessation
posted by Ryan DuBosar at
12:51 PM
0 Comments
Friday, November 6, 2009
QD: News Every Day--waiting for the weekend
ACP Internist's daily digest of news and events continues with this weekend's expected vote on health care reform, H1N1 influenza's ascendance as the dominant strain, and Texas' look at doctor-owned hospitals.
Health care reform
Everyone is gearing up for the expected weekend vote in the U.S. House on health care reform. ACP President Joseph W. Stubbs, FACP, said while the legislation doesn't have every proposal the organiation wants, it "... would represent an historic step forward to achieving ACP's desired future of a U.S. health care delivery system that provides access, best quality care and health insurance coverage for 100% of its people." The American Medical Association is supporting it, with its president saying in a press release that while the legislation is not perfect, "It goes a long way toward expanding access to high-quality affordable health coverage for all Americans, and it would make the system better for patients and physicians."
While the Congressional Budget Office estimates the legislation will cost $894 billion over 10 years and reduce the national deficit by $30 billion, the actuary for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said he may not have an estimate ready by the weekend vote. While Congress is bound to budget office estimates, CMS figures may sway some votes. (The Hill)
H1N1 influenza
H1N1 influenza is now the dominant strain globally. Obesity may be a factor for complications. More on this will be reported in ACP InternistWeekly on Tuesday. (CNN, CBS News)
In case you missed it ...
This weekend's New York Times Magazine features the debate about evidence-based medicine--clinical judgment squares off against the scientific method, and what happens when doctors at Intermountain Healthcare create their own evidence base.
In Texas, legislators are debating how to treat doctor-owned hospitals. Texas has 67 physician-owned hospitals with about 50 more expected to open, state Rep. Sam Johnson told the Dallas Morning News. While pending legislation would severely curtail existing facilities and prohibit new ones, amendments may grandfather the existing ones. At is issue is whether these facilities cherry-pick the wealthiest patients.
Labels: evidence-based medicine, H1N1, health care reform, QD
posted by Ryan DuBosar at
10:47 AM
0 Comments
Monday, October 19, 2009
QD: News Every Day--the H1N1 fist bump
ACP Internist's daily digest of news and events continues with ways to avoid spreading the flu (and how it's making us rude), Michigan's proposed doctor tax, and a review of evidence-based medicine.
H1N1 influenza
A feature story profiles how ways to avoid spreading disease are making society less civil (fist bumps instead of handshakes) Thomas Fekete, FACP, says that it's only reducing risk by 1%-2%.
Primary care shortage
Michigan is considering taxing physicians. They propose a 3% physician tax to offset Medicaid cuts to hospitals. The measure could generate $300 million, which would recoup another $525 million in matching federal money. Michigan's hospitals, nursing homes and health plans already pay a physician tax, as do 44 other states. The Michigan State Medical Society Michigan Osteopathic Association oppose it, saying it will exacerbate the primary care shortage and shortchange specialists, but the Michigan College of Emergency Physicians supports it, saying the tax would fund increased reimbursement for Medicaid, which in turn would encourage more primary care doctors to accept those patients.
On the plus side of the balance sheet, Pikeville College will expand its School of Osteopathic Medicine to reduce the primary care shortage in eastern Kentucky. The $4.5 million expansion may eventually increase each year's class from 75 to 125 students. Of course, once they're students, they're overwhelmed by the pace and the scope of school loans, as profiles in northwest Indiana relate.
Evidence-based medicine
One doctor relates the dangers of trying to apply rigorous reviews to individual patients, in this case, his own mother. Another caveat to evidence-based medicine is who's providing the evidence base. Online health sites that allow patients to directly compare (sometimes unapproved) treatments and outcomes are cropping up more rapidly--nearly 500 by now. These sites combine social media with aspects of wiki-style medical references and evidence-based medicine. Patients are turning to them for H1N1, for example. ACP Internist profiled one such site and the controversy it generated a year ago.
Labels: evidence-based medicine, flu, H1N1, primary care shortage, QD
posted by Ryan DuBosar at
12:56 PM
0 Comments
Friday, October 9, 2009
QD: News Every Day on insurance coverage, primary care shortage and H1N1
ACP Internist's daily digest of internal medicine in the news continues with who's covering the uninsured, students weighing in on why they eschew primary care careers, and H1N1's widespread but less lethal path.
Covering the uninsured
While the number of uninsured people rose slightly from 2007 to 2008, more people were covered by government programs as employer-sponsored coverage continued to decline, according to the U.S. Census. The ACP Advocate reports census figures showing that 15% of the population was uninsured in 2008, increasing from 45.7 million to 46.3 million. However, coverage by private plans fell from 67.5% to 66.7% and coverage by employers fell from 59.3% to 58.5%. Government coverage rose from 27.8% to 29%.
Primary care shortage
Medical students weigh in on health reform, and have their doubts. Also, they won't go into primary care. "When it's a difference of $200,000 in your paycheck, it's tough," one student said.
Flu update
The H1N1 pandemic has been more widespread than lethal, notes the Harvard Health Letter. The virus seems to cause fewer cases of serious disease than expected. Harvard experts discussed the latest at a forum, with video posted online. In short, estimates for the death rate for H1N1 range between one death for every 2,000 symptomatic cases and one death for every 14,000 (0.007%). In comparison, the death rate for seasonal flu is roughly one death for every 1,000 to 2,000 cases. Seasonal flu infects roughly 5% to 20% of the population annually, whereas pandemics infect 25% to 40%. This H1N1 epidemic may not rise to pandemic levels.
In case you missed it ...
Doctors drive medical consumption, not patients. Illness and patient preference play a much smaller role. NPR reports on one epidemiologist's lifelong work. Meanwhile, a Newsweek columnist weighs evidence-based medical treatments against clinical judgment. It's the age-old question: How does a study impact treatment of the patient sitting before a doctor, seeking a cure?
Labels: epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, flu, H1N1, health insurance, medical education, primary care shortage, QD
posted by Ryan DuBosar at
12:34 PM
0 Comments
ACP Internist hosted Grand Rounds on June 16, wrapping up the best of the medical blogosphere. Click here for the complete wrap-up.
Contact ACP Internist
Send comments to ACP Internist staff at acpinternist@acponline.org.
Previous Posts
- QD: News Every Day--Santa's take on H1N1 influenza...
- Rethink pink: breast cancer screening evidence met...
- QD: News Every Day--Santa's take on H1N1 influenza...
- QD: News Every Day--when evidence and politics col...
- Ghostwriting haunts Congress' hallowed halls
- QD: News Every Day--payment fix inches forward (fo...
- QD: News Every Day--not the intended effect
- Medical news of the obvious
- QD: News Every Day--flu's growing tally
- QD: News Every Day--no holidays for Congress
Archives
Blog log
American Journal of Medicine
Also known as the Green Journal, the American Journal of Medicine publishes original clinical articles of interest to physicians in internal medicine and its subspecialities, both in academia and community-based practice.
Clinical Correlations
A collaborative medical blog started by Neil Shapiro, ACP Member, associate program director at New York University Medical Center's internal medicine residency program. Faculty, residents and students contribute case studies, mystery quizzes, news, commentary and more.
db's Medical Rants
Robert M. Centor, FACP, contributes short essays contemplating medicine and the health care system.
Everything Health
EverythingHealth is designed to address the rapid changes in science, medicine, health and healing in the 21st Century.
Getting Better with Dr. Val
Getting Better is the continuation of Dr. Val Jones' previous blog at Revolution Health. It is devoted to helping people understand health issues from a balanced, scientifically sound perspective.
HealthHombre
A roundup of health policy news drawn from a database of hundreds of Web sites.
Interact MD
Michael Benjamin, ACP member, doesn't accept industry money so he can create an independent, clinician-reviewed space on the Internet for physicians to report and comment on the medical news of the day.
Kevin, MD
The alter ego of Kevin Pho, ACP Member, is the closest thing to royalty in the medical blog world.
LSUHSC-S Medical Library Evidence Alert
Major guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and/or major reviews by national and international organizations.
PLoS Blog
The Public Library of Science's open access materials include a blog.
White Coat Rants
One of the most popular anonymous blogs written by a doctor.
